I am a Film Studies graduate and aspiring Film Critic. Film, Art, Music and Literature is my biggest passion in life. I observe and analyse. I was born to write. My main interests in film relate to Psychology and Surrealism. I'm a nonconformist,a dreamer forever asking questions and looking for answers. I write reviews and essays. I'm a big fan of Avant Garde Cinema, Independent Films, Surrealism, Neo Realism, Expressionism, Film Noir and World Cinema.

Wednesday 19 October 2016

The Haunting Beauty of La Haine




Police representation in La Haine






La Haine, changed the way I view films. This film is a perfect example that enables us to see that, films are in fact more than just pretty pictures, and the film medium is a powerful tool that can be used to change our world. The film provokes its audiences to feel something, the film entertains us through its satire, but it’s not a film you watch to be simply entertained, you watch this film and you get the urge to change the world, stand up, and fight for your rights. When I first encountered this film, I was amazed, frustrated and saddened at the same time. Throughout watching this film, I felt a sense of real world issues, the film itself is filmed in a documentary style; it uses real life footage in the opening credits. In my opinion everything about this film is perfect. Marley’s music complements the French culture, who feels oppressed, lost and pushed to their extremes. In my opinion, the film is ageless; it tackles issues that somehow always seem relevant. This makes me wonder, how we should feel about this. It’s been over two decades since the film was released, but yet nothing has changed, perhaps the world has evolved, but we are still faced with the same horrendous issues. From a sociological point of view, the film is a masterpiece, through its astonishing cinematography, use of dialogue and sound it creates a haunting tale, a tale about three young guys, three trouble makers. However, those three troubles makers represent more than we think. Each one of them is us, each bullet piercing their bodies goes through us, not directly, but metaphorically.


The beginning of the film, instantly shows the audience the division between the good (police) and the bad (rioters).The opening sequence, shows large crowds; who are full of rage and at this point, the audience are likely to question why are these people so angry, also police are representatives of law, therefore people should feel safe. 
The music, that accompanies the opening sequence highlights police as brutal, as we hear things such as ‘uniforms of brutality’, this allows the audience to pick up on the fact that, in this film the police are the bad guys. The audience, are also able to see an armed police officer, dragging someone across the street, and although the audience may be aware that police must do their job, they are able to see that perhaps, the police is overusing its power. The audience are also able to see many hateful posters, which are aimed to show how the police is seen by the oppressed underclass. The opening sequence introduces the audience to the ‘real’ world, where there is a huge division between police and the rest of the society, the audience can see that the police is always stood opposite the rioters, and this suggests that although, they are all French citizens they are not equal. This can also cause the underclass to feel alienated from society.


The police is shown as very powerful, the audience always see them in large groups. When Said is shown for the first time, the audience see him stood opposite a crowd of police officers, when the camera zooms in; the audience can see that the police officers all look similar. None of the police officers are smiling, and it is clear that they want people to be scared of them; this suggests to the audience that the police are not interested in keeping people safe, but they use this as an excuse to gain a status. The audience then see Said, writing a hateful message on the police van, this gives the audience an idea of what they can expect from the three main protagonists. It is possible to argue that, the media is trying to brainwash people; as the audience get to see things from two different perspectives, when the riots are mentioned in the news, the main topic that is spoken about is injured police officers. The rioters are shows in a negative light, however, when the audience see things from the protagonist’s perspective, they are able to see that in fact, the rioters suffer more and although they seem to be hateful they are fighting for their rights. This allows the audience to compare the societal reaction to the rioters, and the police because in the news the police are shown as heroes, but in reality they are the bad guys. Throughout the film, the audience are able to pick up the negativity felt towards the police; as they are referred to as ‘pigs’ by most of the underclass. In one of the scenes, Vinz refuses to shake hands with a police officer because ‘he doesn’t shake hands with pigs’, this shows the audience that, perhaps the underclass have been conditioned to hate the police, because the police officer actually helped Vinz, Said and Hubert so they should be grateful; however due to the inequality within society people are made to believe that all police officers are bad.


Most of the police officers shown in this film are white, French, middle class men. They all seem to be targeting the youths, as they suspect everyone to be a criminal. However, the Arab police officer, who helped the trio, suggests that not all police officers are bad. The audience can see, that he is treating people with mutual respect because he, himself was most likely treaded with inequality due to his origins. Although, the overview of the film is showing the police in a very negative way, there is still ‘hope’ because police officers, who once experienced poverty, are more likely to treat people equally. The film, raises the issue of misrepresentation of people in the media, as whenever the trio see police acting nice they are somehow shocked. In one of the scenes, they are called ‘sir’ by a police officer, and they find it hard to believe that for the first time, they have been shown respect by a police officer. The stolen police gun plays a significant role in the film, as it suggests to the audience that the police are the cause of the riots. We can suspect, that the police officer must have been irresponsible and didn’t do his job properly, and that’s why the gun was stolen. It is possible to argue, that the police are bad role models because they carry weapons, and this can make people feel like they can use guns as well because that’s how problems are dealt with in today’s world.


One of the most significant scenes in this film is when Said and Hubert are captured by the police, and later on they are tortured. This scene shows the audience what really goes on behind the closed doors. It can be found as shocking, to see agents of law acting so brutally towards other people. This also highlights the fact that perhaps, police cause the hatred because this allows them to take their anger out on innocent people as they are not equally human as them, simply because they are poor. This scene shows that younger police officers are more reluctant to use violence against the underclass, but the older, more experienced officers are their role models. This suggests that, not all police officers start off as being bad, but they simply take on the role and just get lost in the power they behold. The police officers, are behaving in an animalistic way, one of them even says that the hardest part is stopping; this shows the audience that the uniform changes people so much that they forget how to be a human. The film, offers the audience an explanation to why the riots happened, as the audience get a close insight of the division between the police and underclass.


The narrative of the film, reveals to the audience that people are made to hate other people, and because of the media, people feel the need to be aggressive. Towards the ending of the film, the audience can see that the hatred is getting out of control, as the only thing that drives Vinz, is to kill a pig as this will set him ‘free’. The film is so successful, because it really shows the ‘real’ lives of people, and many people can relate to the three main protagonists. The ending of the film is shocking, but somehow, the audience could suspect what was going to happen as there was a war between the police and the underclass, therefore it was just a matter of time to see who wins. The film shows that the police shouldn’t be treated any differently, they are even more brutal in their actions but compared to normal, working class people they can justify their animalistic behaviour, by stating that they had to behave in such a way because this is what their job requires them to do. Often, police are glorified in the media as they are always the heroes, but La Haine, reveals the shocking truth that is hidden away from the society. The ending of the film, reveals how irresponsible police really are as Said and Vinz were stopped for no reason, in fact the audience may even feel that Vinz has changed because he gave the stolen gun to Hubert and he no longer feels the need for revenged. Although, the police officer didn’t intentionally kill Vinz, the shooting foreshadows where society is going, as the brutality of the police is having a major impact on the oppressed people and one thing leads to another bad thing. It is heart-breaking to see Hubert, who seemed to be the most rational out of the three, to take justice into his own hands because he simply had enough.

In conclusion, the film offers the audience a clear picture of how society is structured. The audience see the clear division between classes and police, there is constant rivalry between groups. The film reveals that often, society trusts the wrong people as the ones who are here to protect us are the ones killing us.

Anna Gaszkowska





No comments:

Post a Comment